The Design Engineers Guide to Photo Chemical Etching

As a precision sheet metal machining technology, photo etching achieves exacting tolerances, is highly repeatable and in many instances is the only technology that can cost-effectively manufacture precision metal components with the accuracy necessary in demanding and often safety critical applications. Once design engineers select photo etching as their preferred metalworking process, it is important that they fully appreciate not just its versatility, but also the specific aspects of the technology that can affect — and in many instances enhance — product design. This article analyses the key considerations that design engineers must appreciate in order to get the most from photo etching and benchmarks the process against other metal machining technologies.

General technology attributes

Metals and sheet sizes

Photo etching can be applied to a vast spectrum of metals in a variety of thicknesses, grades, tempers and sheet sizes. Precision Micro stocks over 2000 material types and in addition can supply specialist materials on request as well as work with customer materials on a case-by-case basis.

The process is typically applied to thin metal sheets (sub-1.5 mm) with a maximum sheet/component size of 600 mm by 1500 mm – Precision Micro offering one of largest sheet sizes in the industry. Metals include steel and stainless steels, nickel and nickel alloys, copper and copper alloys, aluminium and hard to machine metals, including highly corrosive resistant materials such as titanium and its alloys.

Standard etching tolerances

Tolerances are a key consideration in any design and with photo etching varies dependent on the material thickness. For materials between 0.025 mm and 0.250 mm the minimum standard tolerance achievable is ±0.025 mm and between 0.250 mm and 1.5 mm ±10% of the metal thickness.

In some instances, traditional metal machining technologies can achieve tighter tolerances, but there are limitations. For example, laser cutting can achieve accuracy to 5% of the metal thickness, but it is often limited to a minimum feature size of 0.2 mm. Photo etching can achieve a minimum standard feature size of 0.1 mm and openings below 0.050mm are possible with development, as is accuracy to ±8% metal thickness. In addition, it must be appreciated that laser cutting is a “single point” metal processing technology, which means that it is usually more expensive for complex parts such a meshes, and it cannot achieve the depth/engraved features necessary for fluidic devices like fuel cells and heat exchangers which are easily attained using depth etching.

Burr- and stress-free machining

When it comes to the ability to replicate the exacting accuracy and minimum feature size capabilities of photo etching, stamping probably gets the closest, but the trade-off is the stress that is imparted in the metal when it is processed and the residual burrs that are a characteristic of press-working. Stamped parts often need costly post-processing, and as expensive steel tooling is used to produce the parts, it is not viable for short runs. In addition, when processing hard metals, tool wear is an issue, with expensive and time-consuming refurbishment often necessary. Many flexure spring designers specify photo etching due to its burr- and stress-free nature, zero tool wear and speed of supply.

Unique features at no additional cost

Unique characteristics can be designed into products manufactured using photo etching due to the inherent edge “cusp” created during the process. Precision Micro can control etch cusp, and by doing so introduce a range of profiles allowing the manufacture of sharp cutting edges, such as those used in medical blades, or conical openings, such as those used to direct fluid flow in filtration meshes.

Low-cost tooling and design iterations

For OEMs across all industry sectors looking for feature rich, complex and precise metal parts and components, photo etching is now the technology of choice as it not only copes well with difficult geometries, it also allows design engineers enormous flexibility, facilitating the adjustment of designs right up to the point of manufacture.

One major factor that allows for this is the use of digital tooling, which is inexpensive to produce, and therefore inexpensive to change even up to a few minutes before manufacturing commences. Unlike stamping, the cost of digital tooling does not increase with part complexity, which stimulates innovation, as designers focus on optimised part functionality rather than cost.

For traditional metal machining technologies, it is fair to say that increased part complexity equals increased cost, much of this being a product of the necessary costly and intricate tooling. Costs also escalate when traditional technologies have to cope with non-standard materials, thicknesses and grades, none of which have any effect on the cost of photo etching.

As photo etching does not use hard tools, distortion and stress are eliminated. Also, components produced are absolutely flat, with a clean surface and no burrs as the metal is dissolved away uniformly and evenly until the desired geometries are achieved.

Economical prototyping

With photo etching, you pay by the sheet, not by the part, which means components with different geometries can be processed at the same time from a single tool. This ability to produce many part types in one production run is the key to the enormous cost savings inherent in the process.

Photo etching can be applied to virtually any metal type, including those soft, hard or brittle. Aluminium is renowned for being difficult to stamp due to its soft nature, and laser cut due to its reflectively. Equally, titanium’s hardness can prove challenging. Precision Micro has developed propriety processes for both of these specialist materials and is one of the few etching companies in the world with a dedicated, production ready titanium etching capability.

Add into the mix the fact that photo etching is inherently speedy (for example tooling typically takes a day to produce not 16 weeks!), therefore, being measured in days not months, and the rationale behind the exponential growth in uptake of this technology in recent years is obvious.


Printed on 2017-12-16